Germanwings False Flag: The Hegelian Odyssey of Andreas Lubitz Continues
Source: 21stcenturywire.com
New ‘aviation improvements’ are being proposed in the wake of the downing of Germanwings Flight 9525, as the Hegelian dialectic continues to produce more ‘solutions’ that are derived from a crime scene which points to a plane that was hijacked remotely via its standard Boeing-Airbus Uninterruptible Autopilot System.
21WIRE previously demonstrated how both the mainstream media and civil authorities have begun floating the idea of ‘remote control’ passenger aircraft – even though that technology isalready in place. This call for ‘aviation reform’ is based on the new official dialectic guidelines which now stipulate that “human pilots are fallible and therefore, cannot be trusted”, even though statistical studies consistently reveal that passenger air travel is still the world’s safest mode of long distance mass transport.
The dialectical guidelines have been expanded, with the concept of medical privacy is also coming under fire.
A bevy of media ‘experts’ and authorities claim that the accused Germanwings co-pilot Andreas Lubitz was “mentally ill” and is a “mass murderer” because he allegedly hid his ‘illness’ from authorities. Only there is no actual hard evidence to make these serious capital charges stick.
[...]
After Andreas Lubitz, Should Pilots Have Less Medical Privacy?
The Conversation
Science 20
Since it was revealed that Andreas Lubitz – the co-pilot who purposefully crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, killing 150 people – had been treated for psychiatric illness, a debate has ensued over whether privacy laws regarding medical records should be less strict when it comes to professions that carry special responsibilities.
It has been widely argued that Germany’s privacy laws were to blame for the tragedy. The Times, for example, headlined an article: “German obsession with privacy let killer pilot fly.” Similarly, another article published in TIME said “German privacy laws let pilot ‘hide’ his illness from employers.”
[...]
Read the rest: 21stcenturywire.com
