Hijrah and Jihad
“And those who emigrate for Allah’s sake after they are oppressed, We will most certainly give them a good abode in the world, and the reward of the hereafter is certainly much greater, did they but know;”
– The Qur’an; Surah 16:41
“Migration cannot be ended as long as there is kufr (unbelief) or as long as there is an enemy that resists”
– The Prophet Muhammad
“I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah”
– The Prophet Muhammad
“The West must not fear Islam- when Islam is in power, all people will live peacefully,”
– Iyad al Sheikh Mahmoud, leader of Syrian rebel group, Jabhat al Nusra
The term “Hijrah” refers to a migration for the cause of Islam. Like any spiritual teaching, one can choose to make this an internal quest towards “God-Realization”, or make it something that is literal and “external”, as is typically the case of fundamentalists. The “Refugee Crisis”, aka. the steady migration of Muslims into Europe, that has gone on for months has been described by men like Dr. Mudar Zahran, a Jordanian Palestinian academic, as “the soft Islamic conquest of the West.” Some might argue that the apparent result of this “Hijrah” and/or “Jihad” came to fruition on Friday, November 13th, when the world was shocked by a coordinated terror attack on multiple “soft targets” (non-military/government targets) that claimed the lives of approximately 130 people in Paris, France. It was a coordinated attack that former CIA Director, James Woolsey told the BBC would have required “government-style planning”.
Unfortunately, this was far from an “isolated incident”, but rather was a crescendo on a slew of attacks in recent weeks and months credited to the terror group commonly referred to as “ISIS”. As I have pointed out in previous posts, ISIS is a creation of U.S. foreign policy and the trifecta of U.S., Israeli and Saudi intelligence and geopolitical manipulations in the Middle East. These manipulations and meddlings resulted in deaths of 224 passengers aboard a Russian jetliner on October 31st and then 130 people in Paris on Friday, November 13th.
First, I can’t help but point out the dates of these two attacks. October 31st of course, is Halloween, also known as “Samhain”. Samhain was known to be a time when the veil between the material world of the living and the “Otherworld” of the dead (as well as various etheric entities), was said to be particularly thin. One element of this Holy Day would have entailed a blood sacrifice (typically of an animal). This day has been utilized by occult practitioners over the centuries as a day of potent ritual magick and, in the rituals of dark occult practitioners, alleged human sacrifice.
Second we have Friday the 13th. Known to most as the “unlucky day” of superstition, what fewer people realize that it was Friday, October 13th in 1307 that the King of France ordered the arrest, torture and eventual execution of the Knights Templar. The Templars were originally guardians of pilgrims to the Holy Land during the Medieval Crusades, and were endorsed by the Catholic Church. While originally taking vows of poverty, the Templars grew financially powerful and eventually got into the banking business, lending to both church and state. After becoming deeply in debt to the Templars due to his war with the English, King Philip IV of France “defaulted” on his debt by having the Templars rounded up and executed. However, legend has it that some managed to escape and established what would later become Scottish Rite Freemasonry.
Another interesting tidbit about the 13th date, is that it was on November 13th, 1918 that the Allied troops occupied Constantinople, which was the capital of the Ottoman Empire– the last great Muslim Empire. This marked the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, which led to the crumbling of the Great Caliphate and the rise of Anglo-American hegemony in the Middle East. It is here in Turkey where many of the Syrian “rebels” are being armed and trained, hence the Russian bombing at the Turkish border with Syria that resulted in the fighter jet being shot down (and then the parachuting pilots, and then the medical helicopter), and the recent escalation of tensions between the two nations. More intriguing is the fact that our ally is buying oil from ISIS’ pillaged oil fields, according to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iraqi MP and former national security adviser Mowaffak al Rubaie:“In the last eight months ISIS has managed to sell … $800 million dollars worth of oil on the black market of Turkey. This is Iraqi oil and Syrian oil, carried by trucks from Iraq, from Syria through the borders to Turkey and sold …[at] less than 50 percent of the international oil price…”
It was also in Turkey during a recent soccer match that a request for a moment of silence in memoriam of the victims of the Paris Attacks was met with a chorus of ‘boos’ and chants of “Allahu akbar” (which was chanted by the terrorists during the attacks). Yes these are our “allies”. Similar to our “allies” in Saudi Arabia, which is one of the most brutally oppressive regimes in the Middle East where women aren’t even allowed to drive (where are the Feminists on this one?), and acts as a “home base” for Wahhabism– the brutal, ultra-fundamentalist form of Sunni Islam that ISIS and other Islamic terror groups adhere to.
Meanwhile, President Obama has repeatedly stated that “the removal of Assad is crucial to undercutting the ideology that drives fighters to the Islamic State”. This statement is ABSOLUTE B.S. Assad is the polar opposite of ISIS. Assad’s Syria WAS one of the most developed nations in the Middle East, where Christians and Muslims lived peacefully, and women could go to college and didn’t have to wear burkas. Assad is also a Shiite Muslim, which is the “arch-nemesis” of Sunni Wahhabism, hence Iran fighting ISIS. But as I have stated in previous articles, Assad was on the “wrong team”, so the U.S., NATO, and Israel funded and trained mercenaries and jihadis out of Saudi Arabia, etc. to take down Assad. Now as a result of this, we have ISIS.
The hypocrisy from the Obama Administration has reached near-absurdist levels with all of this. This is demonstrated by recent legal proceedings in Egypt, where evidence arose that the Obama administration used the U.S. Embassy in Cairo to provide direct financial support to key Muslim Brotherhood (a major radical Islamic organization linked to ISIS) political operatives. This should not really come as a surprise for anyone remotely familiar with the Administration’s support for the “Arab Spring” that led to the installation of the brutal Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt that was eventually disposed by the country’s military brass. Likewise, Egyptian officials have called for the President’s half-brother, Malik Obama to be placed on the country’s terror watch list because of his involvement as an owner and investment adviser for the Sudan-based Islamic Dawa Organization, or IDO, and the organization’s umbrella group, the Muslim Brotherhood. The Egyptian Minister of Religious Endowments as well as other Egyptian leaders.
In any case, the Paris attacks have now resulted in France escalating its presence in Syria, (which was the reason ISIS attacked in the first place) bombing ISIS “headquarters” in the region, using coordinates it gained from U.S. intelligence (interesting that the U.S. didn’t go after these targets). Russia has extended an arm of alliance to France, and has also expressed empathy with the shared loss of civilian life, however tensions between Russia and other NATO countries threaten any kind of cohesion. But now, France has a new ally in the war against ISIS in Germany, after France invoked article 47.2 of the E.U. treaty. However Sahra Wagenknecht, a member of the National Committee of the Left Party and the Bundestag voiced concern:
“If you send German Tornados (fighter jets) to Syria, you only create more terrorists and increase the danger of an attack in Germany”
Now it is understandable that the Paris attacks left the population of France and Europe at large in a state of fear and panic, which was evident when firecrackers sent a crowd of Parisians fleeing for their lives. It is this fear and concern that also seemed to justify the power given to French President Francois Hollande and the French Government to suspend separation of powers under a state of emergency (martial law) for an extended period of three months. A recent article out of the New York Times illustrates some of the results of this martial law in France:
“All over France, from Toulouse in the south to Paris and beyond, the police have been breaking down doors, conducting searches without warrants, aggressively questioning residents, hauling suspects to police stations and putting others under house arrest.
There have been 1,072 police searches already and 139 police interrogations, and 117 people have been placed in custody, the Ministry of the Interior said on Monday. Those included a weekend raid on a restaurant selling halal burgers and Tex-Mex food in the Paris suburbs, where officers found nothing suspicious after breaking down the doors.
Many of those being swept up are among the hundreds of French who have already been flagged as potential security threats in the notorious S-files of the security services. The police are now free to pick up and interrogate suspects virtually at will. An indication of the lingering shock of the attacks — and the fear coursing through French society — is that few, publicly at least, are protesting these exceptional measures.”
This is somewhat similar to the state of emergency and martial law (which was actually enabled by the Weimar Republic Constitution established pre-NSDAP power) declared by Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP did after the Reichstag Fire in 1933. This was done to secure Germany from the wave of Communist terror attacks and assassinations that were running rampant throughout Germany as well of the rest of Europe at the time. At that time, this was seen by many as reasonable and justifiable given what had been occurring. The same mentality exists here as ISIS continues its menacing behavior in the wake of the tragedy.
However, just as in pre-WWII Germany, there are definitely voices of dissent amongst the French population, who point to the ability of the French Government to seize electronic data and block internet sites as a cause for concern. Others fear that the imposition of this French police state will cause unfair blanket persecution of the nation’s Muslim population, which is the currently largest in Europe. There is also general concern of the erosion and impeding upon of civil liberties that inevitably takes place during a heightened security “lockdown” of a country.
Another precautionary measure that has taken during the implementation of martial law in France is the closing of France’s borders. This was a move applauded by the growing “Alt-Right” Nationalist Movement that has progressively gained steam in France as well as other European nations with increasingly displaced or marginalized native populations. This has been the result of European nations seeing their populations surge as “Syrian” migrants continue to pour into Europe, and is evidenced by the popularity of figures like Marine Le Pen, who was recently tried for “anti-Muslim hate speech”. Despite demonization from E.U. bureaucrats and the media, this tide of nationalism that is rising in Europe is a natural result of massive influxes of peoples whose look and customs are completely different from the native population. In centuries past, this would have been seen as an invasion.
The real tragic irony here is that the governments of Europe (as well as the U.S./NATO) essentially opened the gates of Europe for the waves of migrants, while simultaneously arming and enabling ISIS and Al Qaeda. Now that the situation has inevitably reached a boiling point these governments are beginning to “drop the hammer” of totalitarianism on their own citizens, resulting in a massive government power-grab and a loss of freedoms for the general population. This is the Hegelian Dialectic of “problem-reaction-solution“.
We here in the United States need look no further than our own backyard for the results of such an event. The 9/11 Attacks have been used to justify a seemingly endless list of civil liberty infractions that seem to only grow more absurd and blatant with phone data collection, warrantless searches, TSA grope-downs and body scanners, and a “terror threat” that seems to continually change (remember when we cared about Al Qaeda?). Simultaneously it is used to justify an endless stream of wars (they never planned on staying out of Iraq) that only serves to enrich the military industrial complex, international mega corporations and international usury finance.
It worth mentioning that the vast majority of these “refugees” that have been flooding into Europe are primarily migrants from various parts of the Middle East as well as Africa, and not actually “Syrian” (of course, who knows when no one requires a passport to enter) who go to primarily go to Europe for economic reasons. As of late September, of the 213,000 “refugees” that had arrived in Europe, only some 44,000 were actually Syrian. A recent article out of NBC News, entitled “Europe Clamps Down on Borders, Leaving Migrants Stranded” stated how Serbia and Macedonia, which lie on the primary migrant route were now restricting the entry of refugees to JUST those from Syria… and Iraq, and Afghanistan. According to the NBC News article, one of the major groups protesting being left out were in fact IRANIAN migrants (as well as Moroccan, Pakistani, etc.). This really starts to change the narrative attempting to be maintained.
It also worth mentioning that for every “widow and orphan” who gets pictured in the press, there are many times that of young, “military-aged” men. I challenge people to look through ALL the different images that have been taken- not just the hand-picked ones chosen to evoke feelings of sympathy and pity. We have also heard open statements from ISIS as well as Intelligence Officials who detail a plan to smuggle some 4,000 ISIS fighters into Europe via the refugee lifeboats. This essentially creates a “Trojan Horse” scenario, which may very well have led to, at the very least in part, to the horrific scene that took place in Paris the night of November 13th.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has stated that these refugees “looked more like an army than asylum seekers.” Orban has gone on to state that the migrant crisis did not happen by chance:
“Ladies and gentlemen, what we face is nothing less than the challenge of finding ourselves at the gateway to the implementation of a deliberate conceptual project… which seeks to marginalise the nation states of Europe… Where this project has failed to overcome Christianity and the identity of the nation state – in conventional political struggle, it will strive to eliminate it on ethnic grounds…”
Jewish Hungarian billionaire investor and social engineer, George Soros, responded to Prime Minister Orban’s desire to first and foremost protect national sovereignty and the people of Hungary:
“[Orban’s] plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle, our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.”
In the early part of the 11th century, A.D., Roman Catholic Europe and the Holy Roman Empire were embroiled in a conflict with the Muslim World, which was seeking to expand its influence along with the spread of Islam. This war came to a head when the Muslim Moors conquered Spain. It was during this conflict when influential Jewish financiers and merchants that had close ties with the Spanish royal courts worked as spies and informants for the invading Moors, and used subversive tactics which enabled the Moorish conquest of Spain. It is thought that the reasoning for this was a combination of resentment towards Christianity, the Catholic Church and the European people, as well as opportunity for financial and political gain. This period was known as a “Golden Age for Jews“. Spain remained a Muslim country until 1492, when King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella mounted a “Reconquista”, booting out the Moors- and the Jews. History is a funny thing sometimes.
Of course, I just couldn’t leave the subject of the “European Multicultural Revolution” without this little gem from Israeli-American actress and founder of the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, Barbara Lerner Specter:
“Europe has not yet learned how to be multi-cultural and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which MUST take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic… societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multi-cultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”
How is it that Europe won’t survive? Perhaps she’s talking about the overall decline of birthrates among Europeans, which has been encouraged by the “Cult of Climate Change” which essentially states that having children is “bad for the planet”. The latest annual summit of these “cult leaders” meets in Paris starting on Monday. Sadly, Europeans and people of European descent can be made to feel guilty about these sorts of things rather easily. This psychology has been exploited to the utmost degree by a culturally subversive media and political establishment. What’s funny is that none of these “environmentalists” are talking about the environmental impact of mass migration into a small area like Europe.
Now we’re going to switch gears a little and look at the situation that is beginning to unfold here in the United States. The Federal Government has stated that it plans on spending $1 billion of taxpayer dollars to transport and settle 10,000 “Syrian” and “Iraqi” refugees this year, and then 85,000 more refugees “from around the world” in 2016, according to Secretary of State John Kerry, and then up to 100,000 refugees in 2017. In a recent interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation”, Kerry proceeded to parrot the popular talking point that “We’re facing the worst refugee crisis since the end of World War II, and I think the United States has to do more…”
However, this is not a move that is supported by the majority of the American people, with recent showing that 6 in 10 Americans do not approve of taking in the “refugees”. This is a point of view that has been declared as being “shameful” by the mainstream media, including beacons of morality over at the Anti-Defamation League. As highlighted in the book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” by Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman, this is an organization that pressured and eventually convinced the FBI to call of investigations of individuals with known affiliation to the Jewish-Russian Mafia who also sought “refugee status” back in the 1970s, stating that doing so would be “anti-Semitic” (of course, pointing out any sort of wrongdoing on the part of a Jewish organization is “anti-Semitic” in and of itself).
...
Read the rest: joshualightningwarrior.wordpress.com
