The War Against Whites Is Massively Incentivized
Source: theoccidentalobserver.net
The war on Whites is getting increasingly obvious, to the point that a very mainstream source, Congressman Mo Brooks, stated it and then refused to back down. This war is being carried on with a number of very potent weapons.At TOO we have stressed the moral onslaught which has inculcated guilt among legions of Whites for actions that have occurred among all peoples (e.g., slavery, segregation) while ignoring morally motivated phenomena that are unique to the West (e.g., the moral crusade that abolished slavery, the Civil Rights movement).But another main weapon is that displacing Whites often has financial rewards. The triumphant multicultural left has created a context in which many Whites benefit financially from the process of White displacement. Obviously, financial incentives are quite powerful in a capitalist economy where most people measure their self-worth by their bank account.Whites who cooperate in their own displacement are handsomely rewarded. White businessmen benefit from immigration because it lowers labor costs — a recurrent theme at VDARE.com. Companies like First Data Corporation directly benefit from immigration by taking a cut of remittances sent by immigrants to relatives in other countries.Another example is the refugee/resettlement program in which money is funneled from the U.S. government to private non-profits, mostly religious groups (Lutherans: “The children are a gift” and we need a second lobbyist in Washington to make sure the gift keeps giving):[A] GAO report quotes a state official who notes “that local affiliate funding is based on the number of refugees they serve, so affiliates (private contractors) have an incentive to maintain or increase the number of refugees they resettle each year rather than allowing the number to decrease.” …Refugee resettlement is a self-perpetuating global enterprise. Staff and management of the hundreds of taxpayer supported U.S. contractors are largely refugees or immigrants whose purpose is to gain entry for more refugees, usually for their co-ethnics.[As an evolutionist, I am shocked that much of the motivation for displacing those evil, racist Whites comes from people favoring their own group.] …According to David Robinson, a former acting director of the State Department’s refugee bureau, writing about the refugee contractors: “the federal government provides about ninety percent of its collective budget” and its lobbying umbrella “wields enormous influence over the Administration’s refugee admissions policy. It lobbies the Hill effectively to increase the number of refugees admitted for permanent resettlement each year ….If there is a conflict of interest, it is never mentioned…. The solution its members offer to every refugee crisis is simplistic and the same: increase the number of admissions to the United States without regard to budgets…” (see here)In the university White professors who want to move into lucrative positions in administration must be warriors on behalf of non-Whites. A noteworthy example is Mary Sue Coleman, who earns north of $900,000/year as the president of the University of Michigan and has been a leader in attempting to preserve racial preferences and in promoting the educational benefits of diversity.But her views are entirely typical in the academic world, and her salary only puts her in 6th place for salaries at public universities as of 2012. It’s inconceivable that one could get a position like this without cooperating enthusiastically with the displacement of White America, favoring affirmative action and cooperating in funding and staffing the infrastructure of the academic left (e.g., ethnic studies departments, gender studies, etc.). The massive social approval University of Michigan president Mary Sue Coleman receives within the culture of the university for her positions on diversity issues is doubtless a positive component of her job.At a lower level on the academic food chain, one of the most important criteria for professors is whether they can obtain government grants which then pay them extra salary and pay the university for the costs of administering the grant — a major source of funding for the university and a major factor in tenure decisions. Right now there is a lot of money in grants aimed at improving the educational prospects of Blacks and Latinos and no shortage of White professors eager to get their hands on that money.[...]Read the full article at: theoccidentalobserver.net
Dan Park - Sweden’s Soviet Style Art Censorship & Dying Freedom of Speech
Ramzpaul - Hour 1 - Multicultural Chaos, Peaceful Nationalism & White Guilt
Ricardo Duchesne - Hour 1 - The Uniqueness of Western Civilization & Multicultural Madness
Mark Weber - Hour 1 - Extremist Watch Groups, Culture Clash & Germanophobia
Kevin MacDonald - The Dispossession of Europeans & Pathological Altruism
Christopher Bollyn - Hour 1 - Solving 9-11, The Deception that Changed the World
Acharya S - Hour 1 - The Moses Myth, Yahweh Supremacy & Cultural Genocide
Mikkel Clair Nissen - Hour 1 - Psychopathic Narcissism & Pathological Collectivism in Denmark
Ingunn Sigursdatter - Norway: Happiest Country on Earth Myth & Awakening the Norsemen
Dale Hurd - Sweden: No Diversity in Politics and Media
Thomas Sheridan - Hour 1 - Cultural Marxism & The Psyop in Europe
Stephen A. McNallen - Ancestral Roots & Metagenetics
Kyle Hunt - Hour 1 - White Identity in a “Post Racial” Society
Dan Rayner - Hour 1 - Asatru Mindset & Reinvigorating the European Spirit
