Red Ice News

Dispelling the Mythmakers

97 per cent of the world to be destroyed tomorrow!
New to Red Ice? Start Here!

97 per cent of the world to be destroyed tomorrow!

Source: blogs.telegraph.co.uk
No, not really. It’s just my little joke, based on pretending to take people like the BBC’s resident climate activists David Shukman, Richard Black and Roger Harrabin seriously.

I’ll tell you what doesn’t amuse me, though. Here I am in Wales, on my holidays, enjoying the semi-sun, and suddenly I get emails from and Tweets from sensible people on my side of the argument saying: "Help! Help! The BBC has gone mad for this story about the NASA satellite showing that 97 per cent of Greenland has melted and apparently it’s ’unprecedented’. What do we do?"


Greenland: nearly all gone. We are doomed (pic: NASA)


Sigh. The right thing to do on occasions like this, I find, is to head straight for Watts Up With That? Unlike, say, the BBC, or the Guardian, or the Independent or most of the rest of the MSM, WUWT’s posts are grounded in actual science and real world data.

And, yep, WUWT makes two very simple points.

1. 97 per cent of Greenland hasn’t melted. (If it had we’d be underwater by now)

I’m sure our readers don’t really need to have it pointed out that the melting event did not melt 97% of Greenland’s ice sheet, but rather occurred over 97% of the surface area of the ice sheet and that the melting event has ended. We will undoubtedly be treated to that 97% statistic for a long time to come.


2. "Unprecedented" is not a strictly accurate adjective to describe something that has happened before.

I had to laugh at the title of their press release, where they cite “Unprecedented Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Melt”, then contradict themselves when the main researcher goes on to say “melting events of this type occur about once every 150 years on average. With the last one happening in 1889“. Do these guys even read their own press releases? Climatologist Pat Michaels concurs saying: “Apparently NASA should start distributing dictionaries to the authors of its press releases.”


Quite. But the broader point to be made is this: don’t believe what the BBC (or NASA or the Royal Society or the Guardian or the Independent or the National Academy of Sciences or the Prince of Wales or Al Gore or any US TV broadcaster that isn’t Fox) tells you about global warming, the environment, climate change, polar bears, sustainability, ocean acidification, glacier melt or Greenland, EVER.

[...]

Read the full article at: telegraph.co.uk

Comments

Red Ice Radio

3Fourteen

Egalitarianism vs Aristocratic Values & Aspects of Fascism
Seth Cooper - Egalitarianism vs Aristocratic Values & Aspects of Fascism
Women on the Verge of Societal Breakdown
Piero San Giorgio - Women on the Verge of Societal Breakdown

TV

Mainstream Media Cover-up #PizzaGate as "Fake News" after Comet Ping Pong Shooting
Mainstream Media Cover-up #PizzaGate as "Fake News" after Comet Ping Pong Shooting
Italy Referendum Live Coverage
Italy Referendum Live Coverage

RSSYoutubeGoogle+iTunesSoundCloudStitcherTuneIn

Design by Henrik Palmgren © Red Ice Privacy Policy