God Emperor Trump Triumphs Over Crooked Hillary and Biased Moderator in First Debate

I’d like to begin with a warning: it’s quite possible that the mainstream media will spin this debate in Hillary’s favor in an attempt to disillusion – or black-pill, if you will – Trump’s loyal supporters.

But fear not! Despite what the Lügenpresse might claim, Trump won this round.

With that out of the way, let’s proceed to the debate itself.

The first topic, achieving prosperity, spawned a discussion on trade, jobs, taxes, and more. Hillary enthusiastically endorsed raising the federal minimum wage; she also mentioned the wage gap which, despite being summarily disproven, continues to find mainstream acceptance. Trump, on the other hand, spoke about the adverse effects of outsourcing. Interestingly, Trump claimed to agree with Hillary on the issue of childbirth and its impact on working women, but said that they disagreed on the specific details.

Things became heated when Hillary attempted to bring up Bill’s past success. Trump went on the offensive and brought up the fact that Bill Clinton signed NATFA, a policy that was later prove destructive to American workers and industry.

Shortly thereafter, the moderator, Lester Holt, questioned Trump on his taxes. Not satisfied with Trump’s initial response, Holt proceeded to press the issue. Hillary then took the opportunity to speculate as to why Trump has not yet released his tax information.

The second topic, race relations, began with Hillary arguing that race continues to determine “too much.” Before you conclude that Hillary has been studying the work of J. Philippe Rushton, I should clarify that she was instead referring to perceived racial discrimination. She also offered a few shallow platitudes concerning the need to “restore trust” between police and and minority communities.

When asked how he would remedy the rather dismal state of race relations in America, Trump immediately stated the need for law and order. Trump cited his overwhelming support from law enforcement, including a recent endorsement our country’s largest police union, The Fraternal Order of Police. Rather unconvincingly, Hillary attempted to argue that American police – along with the modern Left, apparently – are longing for “reform.” While I’m sure the police would like things to change, it is clear that they don’t support any “reform” that Hillary would be willing to propose.

The moderator criticized Trump’s support of stop and frisk – a policy that was quite successful in reducing crime in New York – because it disproportionately affected African Americans. I wonder if Mr. Holt has considered if there might, in fact, be a connection between profiling African Americans and reduced crime rates. This is a perfect example of disparate impact. Non-Whites are objectively committing the most violent (and other) crime in New York; in light of this, wouldn’t it make sense to target blacks and hispanics? Instances like this serve as good, if somewhat irritating, reminders that the Left has declared war on pattern recognition.

The final topic, national security, proved quite interesting as well. Trump attacked Hillary’s failed policies in Libya, Iraq, and elsewhere. Furthermore, he correctly pointed out that these policies created a vacuum of power that led to the formation of ISIS. Trump also pressured Hillary on the Iran deal.

Toward the end of the debate, the moderator surrendered any pretense of objectivity by asking Trump two accusatory questions. The first involved Trump’s comments about Hillary lacking a presidential look, while the second dealt with comments that Trump allegedly made about a female model. Quite predicatbly, Hillary used the opportunity to paint Trump as a misogynist. Keep in mind that these questions were posed in closing, and were not relevant to any of the three main debate topics.

One cannot help but wonder why Hillary was not asked any similarly difficult questions. Given her awful history, it would have been easy to question her about Bill’s sexual deviancy, the Clinton Foundation, her private email server, and so forth. The answer, of course, is that Hillary is the establishment candidate; as such, she had a clear advantage going into this debate.

Nevertheless, Trump held his ground against two opponents. It was an uphill battle, but that has been the story of Trump’s entire campaign. Against all odds, Trump received the nomination. Moreover, some of Trump’s staple issues, such as immigration and terrorism, went completely untouched. Was this intentional? Are these issues being saved for future debates? I certainly hope the latter is the case.

In conclusion, be sure to keep all of this in mind when the mainstream media and their degenerate array of pundits attempt to convince you that Trump floundered tonight – for Trump, despite showing room for improvement, was indeed the victor.