Red Ice News

The Future is the Past

Let’s Be Clear: Establishing a ’No-Fly Zone’ Is an Act of War
New to Red Ice? Start Here!

Let’s Be Clear: Establishing a ’No-Fly Zone’ Is an Act of War

Source: theatlantic.com

The term is a euphemism that obscures the gravity of what its advocates are suggesting -- a U.S. air attack on Syria.

Kudos to Josh Rogin for breaking the news that "the White House has asked the Pentagon to draw up plans for a no-fly zone inside Syria." But wouldn’t it be a more powerful story without the euphemism?

Relying on the term "no-fly-zone" is typical in journalism. But that is a mistake. It obscures the gravity of the news.

Here’s how an alternative version of the story might look: "The White House has asked the Pentagon to draw up plans for bombing multiple targets inside Syria, constantly surveilling Syrian airspace alongside U.S. allies, and shooting down Syrian war planes and helicopters that try to fly around, perhaps for months."

The term "no-fly-zone" isn’t analytically useless. It’s just that folks using it as shorthand should make sure everyone reading understands that, as Daniel Larison put it right up in a headline, "Imposing a No-Fly-Zone in Syria Requires Starting a New War." That becomes clearer some paragraphs later in Rogin’s article, when he discussed Senator John McCain’s advocacy for a "no-fly-zone." "McCain said a realistic plan for a no-fly zone would include hundreds of planes, and would be most effective if it included destroying Syrian airplanes on runways, bombing those runways, and moving U.S. Patriot missile batteries in Turkey close to the border so they could protect airspace inside northern Syria," he wrote.

The article also quotes Robert Zarate, policy director at the hawkish Foreign Policy Initiative. His euphemisms of choice: "No doubt, the United States and its like-minded allies and partners are fully capable, without the use of ground troops, of obviating the Assad regime’s degraded, fixed, and mobile air defenses and suppressing the regime’s use of airpower."

Does anyone think he’d describe Syrian planes bombing a U.S. aircraft carrier as "obviating" our naval assets?

[...]

Read the full article at: theatlantic.com

Comments

We're Hiring

We are looking for a professional video editor, animator and graphics expert that can join us full time to work on our video productions.

Apply

Help Out

Sign up for a membership to support Red Ice. If you want to help advance our efforts further, please:

Donate

Tips

Send us a news tip or a
Guest suggestion

Send Tip

Related News

Sebastian Gorka to CNN's Anderson Cooper: Trump's War on Fake News "is not About You. It is About Actually Having Journalism Back on TV."
Sebastian Gorka to CNN's Anderson Cooper: Trump's War on Fake News "is not About You. It is About Actually Having Journalism Back on TV."
This Dystopian Device Warns You When AI is Trying to Impersonate Actual Humans
This Dystopian Device Warns You When AI is Trying to Impersonate Actual Humans

Archives Pick

Red Ice T-Shirts

Red Ice Radio

3Fourteen

How Right Wing Is Japan Today?
Yoko Mada - How Right Wing Is Japan Today?
European Cooking & Philosophy
Elisabeth - European Cooking & Philosophy

TV

Muslim Vikings Exposed: The Money & Propaganda Behind the Lie
Muslim Vikings Exposed: The Money & Propaganda Behind the Lie
The Harvey Weinstein Scandal Is Why We Need to End the Patriarchy - Operation Reinhard
The Harvey Weinstein Scandal Is Why We Need to End the Patriarchy - Operation Reinhard

RSSYoutubeGoogle+iTunesSoundCloudStitcherTuneIn

Design by Henrik Palmgren © Red Ice Privacy Policy